The government says the coronavirus rules are tough enough. The problem is compliance I've been looking at the data and it says something quite different… sort of A THREAD on what’s going on

8:54 PM · Jan 13, 2021

81
1,453
2,593
This chart comes from the UCL’s brilliant covid-19 social study, which regularly asks more than 70,000 people about their experience of lockdown It shows that compliance is higher than at any point since the first lockdown
14
161
476
The UCL survey distinguishes between majority compliance (following most of the rules) and complete compliance (following all the rules) Both have been rising sharply since December – basically in line with the virus
4
47
275
Majority compliance is now at 96%, the highest since April Complete compliance is now at 56%, the highest since May With one crucial exception, which I'll get to later, self-reported compliance is really very good
4
76
304
Which rules are people breaking and bending? The covid social study gives can tell us Meeting up with more than the recommended number of people is where people tend to ignore the rules outright (never here means "I never obey that rule") But again, generally adherence is good
20
91
279
Of course they may well be right, but it does feel as if compliance is now one of things, like crime, where no amount of data will convince people that things are actually improving Still, to take the question seriously – looking at the data, four reasons stand out
1
38
280
First, the virus is more transmissible. Yes, it’s obvious, but it’s worth repeating Second: the rules are looser. You can see this in the movement data. It’s roughly between lockdown 1 and 2, which is about what you’d expect based on the rules
Mobility data is a very rough measure of lockdown compliance, but for what it's worth here's another chart showing the same trend as the one below, this time from Apple Maps More on this tomorrow when I should have some new data
8
66
271
Retail is a really interesting case study This chart shows retail footfall via @Springboard_: it’s highest in retail parks, where more shops are open and there’s more chance to be distant
9
49
213
To me this suggests people are respecting the rules but also taking advantage of available opportunities Ministers have urged people to stay at home so I guess you could say this is rule-breaking, but shops *are* open If you want to stop shopping, you might need to close shops
11
115
618
(I meant to say there were three reasons rather than four, so count taking advantage of opportunities as reason three, or 2.5 or whatever. Anyway, the point is that you can move around quite a bit *and* still be within the rules)
1
19
180
The final reason is by far the most important There is one rule that seems to be being routinely ignored - and it's probably the most important rule we have
1
46
199
The covid social study asked people how many days they isolated for after they had symptoms This results are frankly horrifying
39
648
1,076
Isolation with symptoms is THE rule. Next to that, everything else pales into insignificance But for some reason ministers don't seem to focus on it. Instead, we hear about breaches of social distancing in supermarket queues
33
337
1,206
I asked @ScienceShared for his thoughts on what could be done. This is long, but it's really worth reading all of it
20
338
918
To end this embarrassingly long thread. The data suggests people ARE sticking to the rules, except the rule that matters above all others I would humbly suggest that we need to shift our focus / ENDS
20
151
830
Forgot to link to the covid social study. It is such a fantastic resource. Its results should really be better known covidsocialstudy.org/results Huge credit to @Daisy_Fancourt and team for all their creativity and persistence
3
108
429
I hate quote tweeting rather than replying directly but I will just so I can add this to the thread I'd say we should believe it, because Springboard measure footfall with tracking cameras. this isn't a survey, it's direct observation
Do we actually believe that in shopping centres footfall is only down by 70%?
5
18
227
For people asking: yes, there is demographic information on who does and doesn’t isolate. The main difference this survey pinpoints is between older and younger adults, although perhaps not the way you might think
43
373
927
This is right and it's a puzzle to me as well. The researchers say it's related to people still experiencing symptoms. Hard to know what to make of that and I've asked for more clarity
Replying to @rowlsmanthorpe
Am I reading that wrong? It seems to suggest that e.g. 48% of young adults self-isolate for 21 days or more, when having been in contact with a Covid infectee. That surely can't be right, can it?
5
2
40